The Evergreen State College
Graduate Program in Public Administration
Core Program: Doing Public Administration, Winter 2004
Tuesday, 6-10 p.m, Lab 1, Room 1047
Faculty Email Phone Office Office hours
Gail Johnson johnsong@evergreen.edu 867-6739 Lab 1, 2005 T/W 3-5p.m; by appt.
Joan Bantz bantzj@evergreen.edu 867-5095 Lab 1, 3011 M/T 3-5pm; by appt.
Gail's homepage: http://academic.evergreen.edu/j/johnsong/index.htm
Overview and Learning Objectives
This quarter we will examine the practical side of public administration with an emphasis on collaboration and the people side of management. Organizations in the public and non-profit sectors face a set of common tasks. They must:
Their leaders must find ways to manage it all, manage balance ? Or osme other word since "manage was just used) their own lives, work effectively with others and move forward despite the inevitable forces of entropy that threaten continuous chaos. This requires a realistic sense of self, grounded in one’s core values, as well as the ability to think creatively and work collaboratively.
The learning objectives for the quarter are to:
Book ListREQUIRED TEXT
Robert B. Denhardt, Robert B. ,Janet Vinzant Denhardt and, Maria P. Aristigueta (2003). Managing Human Behavior in Public and Nonprofit Organizations. paperback Sage. ISBN: 0-7619-2474-4.
Lee G. Bolman, Lee G. and Terrence E. Deal (1997). Reframing Organizations, 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey Bass. ISBN: 0787908215 Paperback. (note: the 3 edition might be out. Use either.
Dolan Julie A., Dolan and David H. Rosenbloom (eds) (2003). Representative Bureaucracy: Classic Readings and Continuing Controversies. M.E. Sharpe. Paperback: ISB N 0-7656-0961-4.
Whyte, David. (1996). The Heart Aroused. New York: Doubleday (paperback).
Rosenbloom and Kravchuk (noted as R and K in the schedule on page 3).
Articles: to be assigned.
Web Crossing: Going High-Tech. We will be using web crossing this quarter to facilitate skill building and create a "real time source" out of class. We will use the last part of the first night of class to get everyone on the system and provide some training. We will beto ensure everyone is part of the site and comfortable with the technology.
Our Agreements
We show up to all classes on time.
We are prepared, listen, and share our views.
What is said in this room, stays in this room.
We respect others.
We disagree with ideas, not people.
We do no harm as we engage in the learning process.
We are honest.
We do our best work.
We turn work in on time.
We actively and enthusiastically engage in learning.
We invest in ourselves.
We create a safe place.
We have fun.
Learning Activities
Learning Objective: Mmastery of material, writing skills, critical thinking and reflective practice.
Learning Objective: reflective thinking and shared responsibility for co-learning community (success?) opportunity.
Your job is to develop a short (20 minutes) training program on this topic. You can use media, engage the class in an exercise, do a role-play, or whatever makes sense. Each member of the group must participate in the presentation. The group will turn in a training design (this is the plan for the training), that lays out exactly how the material will be presented, who will present what, and the start and stop times for each component of the training. It will also include a bibliography.
Teams will present between 2/17, 2/24, 3/2. There will be a sign-up sheet and 2-3 teams will present on each of those class sessions.
The process for working together is a key element of this assignment. Peer evaluations of each team member as well as assessment of the team performance will be conducted.
Learning Objective: Increase specific knowledge, experience in collaborative learning, and team process, and training or presentation skills?.
As part of your research, you will interview the director or program manager about the accomplishments of this program as well as its current challenges. Write an academic paper (include citations, bibliography) , not to exceed 8 pages. You will present a brief (3-minute) summary on the last night of class within seminar. The paper and presentation are due March 9th.
Learning Objective: General knowledge, critical assessment and evaluation, integration of subject matter, and oral presentation skills.
Schedule
Core: Doing Public Administration Winter 2004
|
date |
topics |
readings/Seminars |
What’s due |
|
1/6/04 |
"Know Thy Self", Understanding Others |
Denhardt: Chapters 1-2 Forming Seminar Groups Set-upTraining: Web Crossing |
Vision statement for your life, p. 33-34 Assessments in Chapter 2 appendix |
|
1/13 |
Collaboration, Creativity and Communication |
Denhardt: Chapters 1-3, Chapter 9, Chapter 10. |
Post Reflection Paper #1 by Saturday midnight 1/10 |
|
1/20 |
Soul, Spirit and Heart |
Whyte: The Heart Aroused |
Post by Saturday midnight (1/17)Pick one idea, image, metaphor. |
|
1/27 |
Organizations: Part I Structure and Power |
Bolman and Deal: Chapters 1-5, 9-11. Denhardt: chapter 8 Dolan: Chapter 1 |
Pick one idea, image, metaphor. Post by Saturday night 1/24 |
|
2/3 |
Changed to: Organization: Part II Human Relations and Culture |
Bolman and Deal: Chapters 6-8, 12-14, 15 Denhardt: Chapters 6, 12 |
|
|
2/10 |
Changed to: Diversity |
Denhardt, Chapter 14. Dolan: chapters 2-4 Guest speaker |
|
|
2/17 |
Decision-making, Budgeting |
Denhardt: Chapters 5, 11 Articles: TBA Guest speaker. |
|
|
2/24 |
External Relations and E-government
|
Denhardt, chapter 13 Dolan, Chapter 5 |
rgo out to 2 government or non-profit websites and describe the kind of information they provide and its ease of use. Write-up your evaluation.
|
|
3/2 |
Teamwork Revisited |
Denhardt, Chapter 4 Bolman and Deal, chapters 20-21 |
|
|
3/9 |
Administering a public policy |
3-minute Presentations in Seminar groups. |
|
|
3/16 |
Evaluation Week |
Sign-up |
|
Expectations and Evaluation
:The course is designed as an active/experiential learning community. Much of what will be learned in this program comes from what the guest speakers bring and the work we do together to weave this knowledge with the readings. Therefore, attendance and engagement are required.
Credit: Students will receive 4 graduate credits based upon satisfactory and on-time completion of all course requirements and assignments. The seminar faculty member of the team will make credit denial decisions. No partial credit will be awarded. Plagiarism, failing to complete one or more assignments, completing one or more assignments late (without having made special arrangements in advance of the due date) or two non-excused absences, may constitute automatic denial of credit.
Plagiarism: Plagiarism is not be tolerated To plagiarize is to take ideas and writings of others and pass them off as your own. Forms of plagiarism include:
· Word for word copying of another’s written work
· Paraphrasing another’s work with a failure to properly attribute the idea, thought, or mosaic to the author
· Fabricating sources
· Neglecting quotation marks when a direct quote is used, even when the material is otherwise acknowledged.
Each student is expected to participate in the end of quarter evaluation conference with faculty. For the end of quarter conference, each student is expected to complete and bring to the conference a written self-evaluation – no conference will be conducted without the self-evaluation. Students are also expected to provide a written evaluation of their faculty member. These two evaluations are part of the requirements of the course and must be completed to obtain full credit. However, your evaluation of the faculty can be given to the program secretary.
Students can expect the faculty member to be prepared for classes and seminars, to be available for office hours as posted and for scheduled meetings outside of office hours, to respond to telephone or email messages in a timely manner, and to provide timely feedback on assignments.
All students will receive a written evaluation of their academic performance by their faculty.
Covenants: In furtherance of our learning community, we expect students and faculty to:
· Act in accordance with the Evergreen Contract and Student Conduct code.
· Promote a cooperative, supportive atmosphere within the community; give everyone opportunity for self-reflection and expression.
· Use high standards in reading the text and preparing papers, lectures, and comments in seminar.
· Handle all disputes in a spirit of goodwill.
Both students and faculty agree to discuss any problems involving others in the learning community directly with the individuals involved, with the right to support from other program members during those discussions, if that seems helpful. For example, students must first discuss any problems involving a faculty member directly with the person in question; other faculty will refrain from discussing details of any such problem except in the above format.
Teams:
Think about your best team experience. Write down:
What was the team?
What made it the best?
How did it feel to be part of that team?
In small groups, discuss your experiences and the factors that made it the best team.
On a flip chart, post the key characteristics that were common to all of your best experiences.
On a piece of paper, list what you will do to ensure that this team is a best experience for everyone.