Subject: Re: Project scope document
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2001 09:15:52 -0800
From: "Kelly Franznick" <kelly@blinkia.com>
To: "Randy Keller" <keller1011@qwest.net>

Hi Randy,
I was actually able to review the scope document sooner than I thought.
Overall, it is right on the money. I'm sure it will grow over time. I'd be
happy to review it as often as you like in the future. I only have a few
points of feedback that I've outlined below:

[2.5 a 1]: A typo, I think. We would call it a Tree Structure, rather than
Tree Structured.

[2.5 b 3]: This is probably my biggest point of feedback. We really don't
need the wireframes to be functional. While this would be ideal, I think it
could be combined with the "Code Generation" item you have scheduled for
future release. In other words, we want to create a visual representation of
the functionality, but for instance the buttons don't need to be clickable,
the navigation doesn't need to work. Instead of navigating with the buttons
or navigation, we would simply move from wireframe page to wireframe page
using the outline.

[2.5 b 4]: I'd like to see integration with the outline included here.
Something like: Each line item of the outline must correspond with an object
defined in the Mapping Editor, which must correspond with a page of the
wireframe.

[5 Terminology]: Could we change the terms Sitemap, and Sitemap Editor to
Map, and Map Editor? Sitemap is a term that is specific to Web design, and
we would like this tool to be more generally applied to interaction design
(with Web design being one Template).

Let me know if you have any questions,

-Kelly

--
kelly franznick
blink interactive architects
t 206.447.9551x13
f 206.447.9494
www.blinkia.com

On 11/6/01 8:41 PM, "Nika & Randy Keller" <keller1011@qwest.net> wrote:

     Hi Kelly,

     We came up with a name for the project: Sphinx.

     If you had/have a name in mind, please let us know as we are not
     tied to this name in any way.

     Attached is a first draft of our Project scope document. I just
     kind of whipped this up, and you probably haven't seen anything
     like it before, so please let us know what you think.

     Some of the key points are yet to be determined. We hope to learn
     more about these issues and address them in the weeks to come. Any
     advice or input you might provide would be greatly appreciated

     Thank you for your patience,

     Randy Keller