My Dream: Create a rural learning center in Northern Peru
By Raúl H. Nakasone
Why learning center?
- State or private schools are run/supervised by the
government and there is very little room for experimentation. In Peru
it is possible to create an institution like a community college in a
rural area. This gives some possibilities for experimenting with
curriculum, instruction and evaluation. The institution will have the
structure of a community college but will offer an education for the
entire family. This will involve the creation of a learning center
- Schools are thought to be places were students go to be taught; I
dream of a place were participants will go to learn, those participants
will be called learners and the place where they will find the
knowledge they seek, will be the learning center.
- Learners will not be forced to attend. The center will open so many
opportunities for learning that they will choose to spend their time in
this center and learn actively instead of going to the larger town. We
will apply William Glasser's Choice Theory, Howard Gardner's Multiple
Intelligences theory and Paulo Freire's pedagogy. The facilitators for
this center will be well known community leaders who live a happy and
satisfied successful life (not in economic terms necessarily).
Why rural?
- It is in rural areas where it is easier to find people who have
their four basic needs satisfied: love and belonging, power of the
self, freedom and fun. In highly functioning communities most children
are born in homes where their basic needs are satisfied. When they are
forced to attend institutions, like the school, is when they start
loosing their freedom and with it everything else. Schools, churches
and states still follow a psychology based on stimulus/response and use
coercion. All they (the ones who still have their basic needs
satisfied) need is a safe place (the learning center) where they can
develop their full potential.
- Children apply multiple intelligences up until the time they
attend a structured institution like school which is NOT based in the
same idea of multiple intelligences; this can be fatally confusing. In
rural areas, children find school so foreign that they retain their
idea of multiple intelligences a little longer so it will make a lot of
sense to them when they find this learning center where none is forced
to do anything and it is up to them to choose what they want to learn.
- Freire's pedagogy works when the education process is centered in the
learner and it works better in a place where everybody practices
Socratic dialogue. In rural areas, all the knowledge has been passed
from generation to generation through dialogue. Dialogue is the main
tool for learning and it is one of the main reasons that the strong
sense of community is still alive.
- When children and youth find out that they can cultivate their
natural intelligences in this learning center without having to leave
their village and go to the city, I hope the brain drain from those
areas will be diminished.
- So often in large cities, we have someone who has succeeded at
something, begin a speech by saying: "I was born in the humble
village..." without realizing that her humble village could now have
her as one of its finest citizens. One who may have succeeded creating
sustainable conditions in her village.
Why Northern Peru?
- I have been preparing for this project since 1994 when I
took my first group of Evergreen students to Guadalupe. They spent a
great deal of time at schools and the newly created university. In our
seminars we started conversations about the psychology and the pedagogy
of the education in this area of Northern Peru.
- Since then I have been delivering short courses for teachers,
students and parents, and have tried in those classes a lot of the
educational strategies we use in Evergreen. Now, I have a number of
community leaders who could become the facilitators needed for an
enterprise like this. Every year my Evergreen students visit this town
and because people use Socratic dialogue, in their everyday exchange,
the immersion process for learning about the language and the culture
does work wonderfully.
- Since I know that dialogue is NOT an accepted learning tool at
schools in this area, by opening a learning center where dialogue
will be the main learning tool I anticipate that it will be highly successful.
I visualize my dream as follows:
When the center is already operating; if a group of learners chose to
spend their time playing soccer, there will be a real soccer field,
soccer balls, soccer uniforms and shoes, and a soccer coach. Learners
will have access to learn: the history of the game, about professional
and amateur soccer, nutrition, health and trainning, the Physics of the
game, the rules, the organizations, etc. Their learning will start in
information and comprehension of the sport, go through application of
the rules and physical conditioning to play the game, analysis of games
and biographies of great players, coaches and clubs. The coach will
start teams and coach them. The teams will participate in the local
league. The soccer learners will have a nutritionist who will
demonstrate how to prepare specific foods for athletes and the physical
education facilitator will prepare them physically. A psychologist will
facilitate sessions that will help players to mentally prepare them for
the practice of this sport. We will not seek to graduate
professional soccer players but sports men and women with enough
preparation to either play as professional players, to coach in local
or regional clubs, to become referees or members of boards in the local
soccer league.
Lets say a group of mature women wants to learn to cook new dishes. A
complete curriculum can be created based in this interest, and it can
serve to recover traditional foods and a new view of their own history.
A whole new diet for the area could be started by the participants.
Their small children will have the best of the learning center and
while the parents learn something of their own interest, their little
kids will be exposed to a wide variety of games and toys to learn to
speak, to learn to listen, to learn to read, to learn to write and to
learn to quantify.
If retired farmers wanted to grow something in a small plot, the center
will have enough space, equipment and materials to facilitate this
process. The young kids who are interested could join any project and
learn by doing. There will be audio visual means to show documentaries
in farming and opportunities for retired farmers to exchange ideas with
the young ones. The organization will have a Telecenter connected to
the Internet.
For people interested in drinking and smoking there will be movies and
access to the Internet to learn more about the effects of such
activities. Knowledge about the health effects and the economic effects
will be available and with statistics.
There can also be opportunities to recover traditional drinks and
perhaps to start an industry. There can even be information about the
legalities, the treatment and information about the success and the
failures in developed countries.
The center will start its own clinic of traditional medicines and will
also offer health information on certain days of the week facilitated
by doctors from the area. The center will offer health education to
start a health program based on physical conditioning and healthy
diets to prevent illnesses.
The heart of the learning center: communication.
I believe education should be a road to liberation and not a highway to
domestication.
The educational systems I am familiar with have a strong tendency to
form
citizens with very poor critical thinking skills. This lack of skills
can lead them to easily embrace a colonial mentality. The masses formed
through
this type of education are heavily dependent upon the few strong
leaders that
appear
once in a while. Entire nations move this way or another under the
direction
of those few leaders. These masses live under oppression without even
knowing
it, many even believe that it is easy to change ideological gears when
another
leader wins elections. It is almost impossible to realize that those
changes
are solely passing from one oppressive state to another. According to
brasilian
educator Paulo Freire, nobody can liberate an oppressed person; only
the
oppressed person can liberate herself and by doing this also liberate
her
oppressors. If we put together these ideas, we can see that we need to
offer
our children a different education, one that doesn't try to domesticate
them.
We also need to offer adults an education that will help them discover
their
own state of oppression so they can start the hard road to freedom.
This
way if children are growing up free and adults working to liberate
themselves
we will be building societies formed by free individuals, this will
make
true the existance of free societies where social justice and peace are
practiced.
When we carefully review the history, we find how so many bloody
revolutions
have mostly accomplished nothing, they have just taken the masses from
one
oppressive state to another, mainly because after their revolution, as Freire says "the
oppressed
ones became the new oppressors." Education needs to be changed but this
change
can not come from the top; liberation is an individual business, there
is
no way to free everybody by passing a new law. This business to
liberate
oneself has nothing to do with violence, it has nothing to do with
blaming
someone else and killing them. It entirely has to do with reflection
and
building self esteem, freedom is a very personal matter. We are born
free,
we should remain as free as possible, and we should be able to build
free
societies.
When we look around the kind of world we have created, it is visible
that it is all based on the stimulus-response model of thinking. This
in educational terms means that we teach our children in the very same
way we train our pets. There have to be winners and loosers, first
places and last places, rich and poor and so on. If each one of us
could just review the psychology and the philosophy that drive our
life, we would at least ask the question, is there another way?
Mi Sueño
Cuando decidí dedicar parte de mi vida a realizar trabajo
voluntario internacional, lo que estaba haciendo era unir la
teoría con la practica. La educación debería ser
un camino hacia la liberación y no una autopista a la
domesticación. Los sistemas educativos que conozco tienen una
fuerte tendencia a formar ciudadanos con pocas habilidades para pensar
críticamente. Esta pobreza para pensar críticamente les
conduce a abrazar fácilmente una mentalidad colonizada. Las
grandes masas asi formadas dependen demasiado de los escasos lideres
que aparecen de vez en cuando. Esto hace que naciones enteras sean
movidas al vaivén de lo que hace o no hace un grupo que dirige.
Estas masas viven en estado de opresión sin saberlo y creen que
pueden recibir fácilmente una doctrina y mas tarde cambiarla por
otra sin darse cuenta que sólo estan pasando de un estado
dependiente a otro. De acuerdo a Paulo Freire, nadie puede liberar a la
persona asi oprimida; solamente la misma persona puede liberarse a si
misma y ayudar a liberar a sus opresores. Entonces si unimos estas
ideas, necesitamos ofrecer a los niños una educación que
no los domestique; y a los adultos una educación que les ayude a
darse cuenta de su estado de opresión. Asi con niños
creciendo libres y con adultos luchando individualmente por su propia
liberación estaremos construyendo sociedades libres formadas por
individuos libres y en donde se practique la justicia social y la paz.
Todas
las revoluciones han producido muertos por millares y las masas
vencedoras no han logrado la liberación que ofrecian,
sólo han servido para pasar de un estado de dependencia a otro.
En algunos casos, los oprimidos se han convertido en opresores, lo que
sólo ha significado libertad para nadie.
La educación necesita cambiarse pero este cambio no puede
ordenarse desde arriba, la liberación es un asunto personal, no
se puede decretar la libertad de las personas (aunque la libertad
física si). La educación como sistema se ha establecido
para determinar una forma de pensar y una
forma de actuar y claro, en favor de quienes la han establecido; por
eso,
las reformas educativas mayormente han estado dirigidas a mejorar los
resultados
en los exámenes estandarizados; no han estado dirigidas hacia la
formación de los individuos como seres humanos librepensadores.
Para compartir estas ideas realizo mi trabajo comunitario
internacional.
My dream is to start my own
school in the rural town of Guadalupe in Northern Peru. I am convinced
that overpopulation will make life much harder everywhere in the near
future. Problems in large cities are totally different than problems in
rural areas. One small step to make life easier for some people could
be to stop migration from the rural towns to the large cities. For this
to happen, people in the rural areas
need to believe they can build a future right
there where they are born. The primary
education they receive in their home town needs to prepare them to
become not only citizens of the world but citizens of their own town
first.
I consider myself a citizen of
Guadalupe, I have been spending a lot of time there doing community
work with my students from The Evergreen State College and with local
youth
organizations and schools. Evergreen students and I have done research
on learning/teaching in schools around the area and have established
excellent
relationships with educators, parents and students. I know this dream
of
mine will not just happen, I have been doing a lot of preliminary work
since
the summer of 1994. I am ready to start experimenting for long
periods
of time doing field work.
I did a three month
program which started in December 2001 and ended in February 2002 in
Guadalupe. This program's main objective was to demonstrate that the
teaching/learning methods we use in The Evergreen State College can be
replicated in rural schools
in Peru with K-12 students and adults. I had a six week intensive
program
during the Peruvian summer right there in their beach town called La
Barranca.
I invited high school students from the Olympia area and college
students
from TESC to come along to assist me as facilitators. This short
program
served to build a small community at the fishing village. There is a
lot
of potential to ignite programs there every summer. This time the
enfasis was in recycling and the concept of garbage, we used solar
energy toys
to learn the concept of energy and recycled empty plastic bottles to
invent floating devices. I hope to offer this program for two more
winters at TESC (summers in Peru) while I find the person/organization
willing to finance the rural school of my dreams.
To visit Guadalupe, click here
please
If you are interested in
knowing more about this project, write me at: nakasonr@evergreen.edu
Return to
Main Page