Upward Bound Summer 2005
Project Seminar Evaluation Rubric
The rubric is a general guide for evaluating projects. Please pick the point category for each criterion that best describes the criteria.
Criteria |
4 Points |
3 Points |
2 Points |
1 Point |
Total Points & Comments |
Strong Verbal Communication |
Looks regularly at the audience; speaks clearly; speaks exclusively or almost exclusively from memory; refrains from using repetitive phrases such as “you know?” “like” “um”; varies speaking tone regularly; has clear enthusiasm for topic Presentation is 5-7 minutes |
Looks at audience fairly regularly; reads from paper or slides and regularly speaks from memory, rarely uses repetitive phrases such as “you know?” “like” “um”; some enthusiasm for topic Presentation is t least 5 minutes but not over 8 minutes |
Occasionally looks at audience; occasionally speaks clearly; regularly uses repetitive expressions such as “you know?” “like” “um”; reads mostly from paper or slides; varies speaking tone occasionally; enthusiasm for topic unclear. Presentation is at least 3 minutes or over 8 minutes |
Looks only at note cards/ slides/ feet, etc; speaks softly; often uses repetitive expressions such as “you know?” “like” “um”; only reads paper or slides; speaks in a monotone manner; needs enthusiasm for topic. Presentation is under Under 3 minutes or over 9 minutes |
|
Content |
Content is factual/accurate, relevant; content is logical; content reflects subject excellence; personal research/not plagiarized |
Most content is factual/accurate and relevant; content reflects subject matter competence; content is largely logical; personal research/not plagiarized |
Has some factual content, some relevant content; content reflects some subject matter competence |
Needs factual content, relevant content; content requires a logical progression; content needs demonstrate subject matter competence Project contains obvious and pervasive plagiarism |
Criteria |
4 Points |
3 Points |
2 Points |
1 Point |
Total Points & Comments |
Quantitative Reasoning |
Contains more than 1 accurate graph or table; graphs or table has multiple data points; tables or graphs have short explanations; graph/table is clear for audience |
Contains 1 graph or table that is related to subject of presentation, graphs or table has multiple data points; has short explanation |
Has at least 1 graph or table; table or graph has some inaccuracies/unclear for audience; graph or table has at least 2 data points; table or graph requires short explanation text |
Needs graph or table, or graph; or table is unrelated to presentation; or graph or table only has 1 bar or data point |
|
Design/Artist Element |
Design elements are artistically skillful; interesting; strongly integrated to presentation |
Design elements are artistically competent, integrated with presentation |
Design element is in preliminary form, needs substantial work |
Needs design elements or design elements are unrelated to subject of presentation |
|
PowerPoint Structure |
Presentation has all six of the following elements: title slide, a thesis slide, more than 2 evidence slides; a analysis slide and a conclusion slide, and a sources slide presentation has 8-10 slides Slides have no obvious inaccuracies |
Presentation has all six of the following elements a title slide, a thesis slide, 2 evidence slides; a analysis slide and a conclusion slide, and a sources slide Presentation has at least 7 slides Slides contain up to 3 inaccuracies Presentation has no more than 10 slides |
Presentation has at least 4 of the following six elements: a title slide, a thesis slide, 2 evidence slides; a analysis slide and a conclusion slide, and a sources slide Slides contain 4 to 8 inaccuracies Presentation includes contains11-13 slides |
Presentation needs 4 or more slides from the following elements: a title slide, a thesis slide, 2 evidence slides; a analysis slide and a conclusion slide, and a sources slide Slides present contains more than 8 inaccuracies Presentation contains more than 14 slides |
Criteria |
4 Points |
3 Points |
2 Points |
1 Point |
Total Points & Comments |
Poster Board Structure |
Poster board contains text and images containing a title, thesis, evidence, analysis, a conclusion and sources Poster board has no obvious inaccuracies Post board display make balanced use of space |
Poster board contains text and images containing a title; thesis, evidence, analysis, a conclusion and sources Poster board contains up to 3 inaccuracies Poster board makes adequate use of space |
Poster board has at least 4 of the following elements: text and images containing a title, thesis, evidence, analysis, a conclusion and sources Poster board contains contain 4-8 inaccuracies Some poster board elements take up to much or too little of space |
Poster board needs 4 or more of the following elements: text and images containing a title, thesis, evidence, analysis, a conclusion and sources Poster board contains more than 8 inaccuracies Poster board elements take up to much or too little of space |
|
Written Essay |
Paper has all of the following elements: a title, thesis, evidence, analysis, a conclusion and sources Paper is at least 3 pages, has 6 paragraphs or but is not longer than 10 pages Personal research and writing/not plagiarized |
Paper has all of the following elements: a title, thesis, evidence, analysis, a conclusion and sources Paper has at least 5 paragraphs but is not longer than 10 pages. Personal research and writing/not plagiarized |
Paper has at least 4 of the following elements: a title, thesis, evidence, analysis, a conclusion and sources Paper contains suspected but limited plagiarism Paper contains at least 3 paragraphs or shows dramatic improvement from initial drafts |
Paper needs at least 4 of the following elements a title, thesis, evidence, analysis, a conclusion and sources Paper contains obvious and pervasive plagiarism |
|
Grand Total: |